Proposition: For any bijection on an
interval
i |
We understand this as a common notation for open and closed intervals. In the open case we also allow the values for the right and for the left boundery. Thus and e.g. are regarded as intervals as well.
|
we have:
f continuous continuous
|
[6.3.11] |
Proof: We start with a closed interval I and proceed indirectly. Suppose that there is an and a sequence in B such that but with not converging to . Then we find an such that the special -neighbourhood lacks almost all of the sequence members. Thus we can create the recursion
to get a subsequence in I with all it's members being outside [1]. As I is closed is a bounded sequence and thus has an accumulation point b according to the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem [5.8.6]. Due to [5.8.5] there is now a further subsequence such that
With I being closed we have and as f is continuous at b we see . On the other hand we know that . Therefor we have i.e. . But this actually means and thus contradicts [1].
Now let I be any interval and be arbitrary. We find a closed interval with . The restriction is continuous on J and using a result from part 6 ([6.6.6]) we find that is an interval. Thus and locally coincide at a. So is continuous at a because we know from the first part that is continuous at a.
|